HOME | BOOSTER | CEMETERIES | EDUCATION | GHOST TOWNS | HEADSTONE
MINOTTO | PICTURES | ROADS | JACK SWILLING | TEN DAY TRAMPS
American Pioneer & Cemetery Research Project
Internet Presentation
Version 050809
Dry Stack
Walls – A Pioneer Legacy
By Allan Hall
In Part Four of this
series we examined a variety of dry stack terrace walls that are found at old
mines and settlements. These were built
to provide flat areas for housing and cemeteries. In Part 5 we conclude the series with a
discussion of Dry Stack Cabins.
Part
Five: Rock Cabins
Our
modern concept of a cabin probably conjures the notion of a place up in the
high country where you go to relax on weekends and during the hot summer. This typical “cabin” has hot and cold running
water, a microwave oven, indoor shower and toilet, and may even sport a solar
panel on the roof. There will be double
pane windows and a gas burner in the fireplace.
Of course, the fireplace would be purely for enjoyment since the cabin
will have a heat pump that provides thermostatically controlled, whole-house
warmth (or cooling) on demand. It may
have two or three bedrooms and a loft, and probably has a security system for
peace of mind when you are away.
Figure 1, Dry Stack Cabin at
These
so-called “necessities” would have been unimaginable luxuries to the miners and
settlers who built dry stack cabins in territorial
1.
The
entryway had no door. Wood planking
would have been needed for the door and its frame, but no suitable materials
were locally available. The entry was
probably covered (from the inside) with a piece of carpet or other heavy
material to block wind and rain, and to help retain heat from the fireplace
during the winter season.
2.
The
wood beam at the top of the doorway appears to be a roughly shaped piece of
juniper; which could have been obtained from a higher elevation in the nearby
Bradshaw mountain slopes. The (very)
course nature of the wood indicates it was not made of Ponderosa pine, which would
only have been available above 5500 feet and perhaps fifteen miles to the northeast
of this cabin.
3.
The
dry stack walls below the wood beam and the rear fireplace wall appear to have
been constructed with shaped stone. The
faces of these walls are generally smooth, the entryway is neat and vertical,
and the courses of rock are tightly fitted.
4.
The
area above the wood beam is not uniformly constructed. In some respects, this section of the wall
appears to be a jumble of irregular rocks that were used to form the angle for
the roof.
5.
The
small openings on the right side of the wall may possibly have been for defense
against attack.
6.
The
opening above the entry (and a similar opening at the rear of the cabin)
provided ventilation.
7.
The
floor of this one room cabin was dirt.
8.
The
relatively small size of the fireplace suggests it was used for heating the
interior and was probably not used for cooking.
When you consider that the temperature
in the high desert can range from the mid-90’s in April to 115 (or higher) in
August and September, it is no wonder that food preparation would have been
more pleasant outside of the cabin.
Figure 2, Reverse View - Dry Stack
Cabin. Photo by Neal Du Shane
Figure 2 shows a reverse angle of the
cabin at
The roof of this cabin may have been
made with sapling poles that supported a canvas tarp. Regardless of the method of construction, it
is unlikely that the roof would have been watertight. No evidence remains of the roofing material today.
Historical information on the earliest
days of
Figure3, Natural Stone Cabins
The construction of dry stack cabins
was not limited to the use of flat, shaped rocks. Figure 3 shows two small structures that
relied upon material that is best described as boulders. The lower cabin (bottom center) is a small,
single room structure. The cabin in the
center differs only in size. In both cases
it is likely the roofs used the pole and canvas method. There is no evidence of a fireplace or
chimney structure in either cabin.
Because they are located in the immediate area of a mine, it probably
means that meals were provided to workers at a central location at the camp,
since there is no evidence of cooking pits at either cabin.
Neither structure shows any indication
of a peaked roof, as compared to Figures 1 and 2. Thus, it is reasonable to conclude these were
semi-permanent “tent cabins” that may have been used by a series of itinerant
miner workers.
Figure 4, Dry Stack Cabin at Unida Mine
Figure
4 provides an example of a dry stack cabin that used a mixture of shaped and
natural stone to achieve a tight fit.
The courses of rock in the walls were carefully laid, but rise only to a
height of less than five feet. Notice
the absence of rock debris around the structure. If this building had collapsed from natural
causes, you would see a lot of material lying along the wall margins. Instead, I speculate that portions of the
cabin walls were removed, possibly to build another structure nearby. Of particular note is the front wall in the
left center of the photo, which is nearly three feet wide. Another distinguishing characteristic of the
cabin is that these grayish stones do not match the local granitic rock. The material must have been hauled in from a
quarry site.
Figure 5, Natural Destruction of Cabin
The
rock cabin shown in Figure 5 is located near the bottom of a wash that flows
into Buckhorn Creek, east of Wickenburg.
Unfortunately, the builder selected a location that was a bit too close
to the wash, resulting in the eventual demise of the structure. Even so, there are several important features
of this cabin. For example, the interior
wall was built into the hillside. The
fireplace and rear wall serve as a retaining barrier against sedimentation from
the uphill slope. The fireplace is quite
large and would easily allow cooking.
The
jumbled pile of rocks in the right foreground are the remains of the right
(south) wall. Interestingly, there is no
evidence that a front wall was ever constructed. Three-walled enclosures may have been a
common occurrence, since an open structure would have provided better
ventilation than a fully enclosed cabin.
This
cabin appears to be quite old and probably pre-dates a settlement to the left
(north) that may have had up to 300 residents in the early 1900’s. The area is dotted with abandoned mines
within a one mile radius of this site.
Figure 6, Miner's Cabin near Keystone
Figure
6 shows a rare example of a dry stack cabin that still contains wood
components. A mine adit and shaft are
about one hundred yards to the east (right) of this photo. This is a typical one room cabin that features
a small fireplace in the upper left corner.
Wall construction appears to be haphazard, as evidenced by the very
large boulders resting on top of smaller rocks on the front wall.
The
seeming abundance of wood beams suggests a roof structure that (again) employed
a canvas tarp, since there is no evidence of other wood roofing materials or
corrugated metal. Another mine
settlement is located in the valley beyond this hillside, but the structures
there were made entirely with wood, indicating a younger age than this cabin.
Figure7, Tent Cabin
In
Figure 7 you see a partially collapsed “U” shaped structure with rock walls
that are about three feet in height. This is probably the most primitive type
of dry stack dwelling you will find. It
is known as a “tent cabin” and was a common method for creating a temporary sleeping
shelter to protect an individual from the weather. This particular “cabin” had an interior
dimension of approximately four feet in width by nine feet. The builder (probably a transient mine
worker) dug a flat area out of the hillside and then stacked the rock walls. A canvas tarp - supported by one or two wood
poles - would have completed the structure.
This type of cabin could only have been used for sleeping and could not
have accommodated more than two people.
In contrast to previous examples, this structure does not suggest a sense
of permanency on the part of the occupant.
This dwelling could have been re-used over a long period of time, since
it is located near two mines that operated from approximately 1885 until 1941.
Figure 8, Ravages of Time. Photo by Kevin Hart
Figure
8 shows a cabin near
When
you examine all photos in this article, it becomes evident that dry stack
cabins were quite small by modern standards and were utterly Spartan in their
features. They may have supported a
single individual or an entire family in a one room structure. They are found in places that were then, and
remain today, in remote and rugged areas.
That remoteness is, perhaps, why they have survived to the present time. These cabins and the other structures shown
in the previous articles, endure because of the respect and forbearance of
visitors who admire the effort and struggle of pioneers who came to the
Every
dry stack structure you have seen in this series, regardless of how well it was
crafted, is a treasure from our past. They
were built by Mexican, Chinese and Native American laborers as well as
immigrant miners and settlers from
American Pioneer & Cemetery Research Project
Internet
Presentation
Version 050809
Copyright © 2009 Neal Du Shane
All rights reserved. Information contained within this
website may be used
for personal family history purposes, but not for financial profit of any kind.
All contents of this website are willed to the American Pioneer & Cemetery
Research Project (APCRP).
HOME | BOOSTER | CEMETERIES | EDUCATION | GHOST TOWNS | HEADSTONE
MINOTTO | PICTURES | ROADS | JACK SWILLING | TEN DAY TRAMPS